OpenClaw + GitHub Copilot GPT-5.4 技术修复指南

OpenClaw + GitHub Copilot GPT-5.4 Technical Fix Guide

Date: 2026-03-07

Overview

This guide documents how to make github-copilot/gpt-5.4 work inside OpenClaw when the model already works in OpenCode but fails in OpenClaw.

The final solution requires both:

  1. a config fix in ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json
  2. a runtime patch in the installed OpenClaw bundle

This is necessary because the problem is not only model registration. It is also an OpenClaw transport-routing issue for GitHub Copilot Responses API traffic.

Symptoms

The following errors may appear during debugging:

Symptom 1: model rejected

github-copilot/gpt-5.4 ... not allowed 

Symptom 2: IDE auth header missing

HTTP 400: bad request: missing Editor-Version header for IDE auth 

Symptom 3: unsupported provider mode

No API provider registered for api: github-copilot 

Symptom 4: wrong endpoint

HTTP 400: model "gpt-5.4" is not accessible via the /chat/completions endpoint 

Symptom 5: gateway instability

gateway disconnected: closed | idle 

Root Cause Analysis

There are four distinct problems.

1. Model config and allowlist mismatch

OpenClaw could see the provider, but github-copilot/gpt-5.4 was not fully wired into the active model config path used by the agent defaults.

2. Missing GitHub Copilot IDE headers

GitHub Copilot requires IDE-style headers for auth. OpenClaw was sending requests through a generic OpenAI-compatible path, so required headers were not included.

Required headers:

User-Agent: GitHubCopilotChat/0.35.0 Editor-Version: vscode/1.107.0 Editor-Plugin-Version: copilot-chat/0.35.0 Copilot-Integration-Id: vscode-chat 

Without them, Copilot returns:

missing Editor-Version header for IDE auth 

3. GPT-5.4 is not a Chat Completions model

gpt-5.4 must use the Responses API, not /chat/completions.

So this is wrong for gpt-5.4:

"api":"openai-completions"

This is required instead:

"api":"openai-responses"

4. OpenClaw transport routing only handled openai, not github-copilot

Even after changing gpt-5.4 to openai-responses, OpenClaw still fell back to the generic stream path because its embedded runner only activated the Responses transport for provider openai.

That caused OpenClaw to keep hitting /chat/completions for GitHub Copilot GPT-5.4.

Files Involved

Config file

~/.openclaw/openclaw.json

Installed OpenClaw runtime bundle

/home/water/.nvm/versions/node/v22.22.0/lib/node_modules/openclaw/dist/reply-DhtejUNZ.js

Reapply script

~/.openclaw/workspace/ken-patchs/reapply-openclaw-copilot-gpt54-patches.mjs

Step 1: Fix the OpenClaw config

Update the GitHub Copilot provider block in ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json.

Provider-level requirements

Use:

"baseUrl":"https://api.individual.githubcopilot.com","api":"openai-completions"

Why keep provider API as openai-completions?

  • OpenClaw runtime expects the provider to stay on a supported generic adapter path
  • switching the entire provider to github-copilot caused runtime/provider registration failures

Model-level requirements for GPT-5.4

Set the gpt-5.4 model entry to:

{"id":"gpt-5.4","name":"GPT-5.4","api":"openai-responses","reasoning":true,"input":["text","image"],"cost":{"input":0,"output":0,"cacheRead":0,"cacheWrite":0},"contextWindow":128000,"maxTokens":64000}

Agent model registration

Make sure this exists:

"agents":{"defaults":{"models":{"github-copilot/gpt-5.4":{}}}}

Step 2: Patch OpenClaw to inject Copilot IDE headers

OpenClaw needs to attach Copilot IDE headers before sending provider requests.

In /home/water/.nvm/versions/node/v22.22.0/lib/node_modules/openclaw/dist/reply-DhtejUNZ.js, add a wrapper like this near the other provider wrappers:

constGITHUB_COPILOT_IDE_HEADERS={"User-Agent":"GitHubCopilotChat/0.35.0","Editor-Version":"vscode/1.107.0","Editor-Plugin-Version":"copilot-chat/0.35.0","Copilot-Integration-Id":"vscode-chat"};functioncreateGitHubCopilotHeadersWrapper(baseStreamFn){const underlying = baseStreamFn ?? streamSimple;return(model, context, options)=>{returnunderlying(model, context,{...options,headers:{...GITHUB_COPILOT_IDE_HEADERS,...options?.headers }});};}

Then apply it inside the provider wrapper logic:

if(provider ==="github-copilot") agent.streamFn =createGitHubCopilotHeadersWrapper(agent.streamFn);

Step 3: Patch OpenClaw to route GitHub Copilot Responses correctly

Find the branch that decides which stream transport to use.

Original behavior:

}elseif(params.model.api ==="openai-responses"&& params.provider ==="openai"){

Replace it with:

}elseif(params.model.api ==="openai-responses"&&(params.provider ==="openai"|| params.provider ==="github-copilot")){

Why this matters:

  • before the patch, github-copilot never entered the Responses transport branch
  • OpenClaw fell back to streamSimple
  • streamSimple hit /chat/completions
  • GPT-5.4 rejected that endpoint

After this patch:

  • github-copilot + openai-responses uses the correct Responses transport
  • GPT-5.4 no longer falls back to Chat Completions

Step 4: Validate and restart

Validate config JSON

node-e"JSON.parse(require('fs').readFileSync('/home/water/.openclaw/openclaw.json','utf8')); console.log('OK')"

Validate patched bundle syntax

node--check"/home/water/.nvm/versions/node/v22.22.0/lib/node_modules/openclaw/dist/reply-DhtejUNZ.js"

Restart gateway

openclaw gateway restart 

Verification Procedure

  1. Set the model to github-copilot/gpt-5.4
  2. Send a simple prompt like hi
  3. Confirm the gateway stays connected
  4. Confirm none of these errors return:
missing Editor-Version header for IDE auth model "gpt-5.4" is not accessible via the /chat/completions endpoint No API provider registered for api: github-copilot 

Reapply After OpenClaw Updates

Because the runtime fix patches the installed OpenClaw bundle, upgrades or reinstalls may overwrite it.

Use the reapply script:

node ~/.openclaw/workspace/ken-patchs/reapply-openclaw-copilot-gpt54-patches.mjs openclaw gateway restart 

Design Notes

Why not switch the whole provider to api: "github-copilot"?

That looked tempting, but OpenClaw’s runtime path did not have a compatible registered streaming provider for that mode in this setup, which caused runtime/provider registration failures.

Why not keep GPT-5.4 on openai-completions?

Because GitHub Copilot GPT-5.4 is not accessible on /chat/completions. It must go through the Responses API.

Why did OpenCode work earlier?

OpenCode already handled the GitHub Copilot transport path correctly, including the required Copilot headers and the proper API mode, while OpenClaw needed both config and runtime fixes.

  • Keep this guide with the reapply script path documented nearby
  • After any OpenClaw upgrade, rerun the patch script
  • If OpenClaw changes its bundle file name, update the script path target accordingly
  • If GitHub Copilot changes required IDE header versions, update both the runtime patch and reapply script

Quick Recovery Commands

node ~/.openclaw/workspace/ken-patchs/reapply-openclaw-copilot-gpt54-patches.mjs openclaw gateway restart openclaw status 

Final State

With the config fix and runtime patches in place, github-copilot/gpt-5.4 works in OpenClaw and the gateway remains stable.

Read more

【年终总结】从非科班无实习到准字节前端:我始终相信,开发之外的事,才是破局关键

【年终总结】从非科班无实习到准字节前端:我始终相信,开发之外的事,才是破局关键

目录 【年终总结】从非科班无实习到准字节前端:我始终相信,开发之外的事,才是破局关键 一、求其外,善其内 1、坚持出发点正确的博文写作 2、博文更新对我心态的淬炼 3、社区交流对我视野的启发 4、向外拓展,反哺内修 二、陷入前端则前端死,跳出前端则前端活 1、从不务正业到泛前端 2、从泛前端到大前端,从有形到无形 三、秋招多少事 四、结语         作者:watermelo37         ZEEKLOG优质创作者、华为云云享专家、阿里云专家博主、腾讯云“创作之星”特邀作者、火山KOL、支付宝合作作者,全平台博客昵称watermelo37。         一个假装是giser的coder,做不只专注于业务逻辑的前端工程师,Java、Docker、Python、LLM均有涉猎。 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 温柔地对待温柔的人,包容的三观就是最大的温柔。

19. Flutter与Web混合开发实践:打造跨平台的统一体验

19. Flutter与Web混合开发实践:打造跨平台的统一体验 引言 Flutter 是一种强大的跨平台开发框架,它不仅可以开发移动应用,还可以开发 Web 应用。随着 Flutter Web 的不断成熟,Flutter 与 Web 混合开发成为了一种新的趋势。作为一名把代码当散文写的 UI 匠人,我始终认为:好的技术应该是无缝的,它应该让开发者能够自由地在不同平台之间切换,而不需要为每个平台重新开发。Flutter 与 Web 混合开发,就是为了实现这种无缝的体验。 什么是 Flutter 与 Web 混合开发? Flutter 与 Web 混合开发是指在同一个项目中,同时使用 Flutter 和 Web 技术(如 HTML、CSS、JavaScript)来开发应用。这种开发方式可以结合

超酷!前端人必备的 3 个 Skills:搞定高级 UI,拿捏最佳实践,最后一个直接拉满“续航”!

最近和几位前端开发者聊天,发现一个有趣的现象:AI 写代码越来越快,但代码质量的差距反而越来越大。 有人用 Cursor 写出来的页面,一眼就能看出是 AI 生成的——紫色渐变背景、Inter 字体、千篇一律的卡片布局。而有的人用同样的工具,却能产出让人眼前一亮的作品。 差距在哪里?不在 AI 工具本身,而在于你给 AI 注入了什么样的"技能包" 。 今天想分享前端开发必备的三个 Skills。前两个是干货分享,能立刻提升你的代码质量;第三个可能出乎你的意料,但确实是我最近的真实体会。 Skill 1: 让 AI 懂设计,告别"AI 味"的界面 你有没有遇到过这种情况——AI 生成的页面虽然能用,但总觉得哪里不对劲? 布局平庸、配色单调、